Menu Home

Guest Post – Quality Player Mark

By Cordwainer Bull

My club (name irrelevant for the purposes of this blogstering) was recently accredited with New Zealand Football’s Quality Club Mark (QCM), an award designed to identify and support clubs which are well run and promote a positive environment.

Meeting the programme’s pre-requisites was a condition of being allowed to enter the northern league this season, and on an amateur landscape where clubs can corral significant sums of community funding, it’s a reasonable proposition to expect certain standards to be met in terms of financial processes, compliance, administration, and leadership.

But watching a Chatham Cup match at the weekend got me thinking. Should we extend this concept of requiring “base conditions” to similarly demand some form of “warrant of fitness” for players who seek to compete at northern league or Chatham Cup level?

In an environment where clubs, administrators, and referees go to a great deal of effort to maintain a competitive standard, should players not also have to step up to the mark and indicate they are “pitch-worthy” beyond the most lumpen measures of being able to run and kick?

In the same way that my club needed a QCM to continue competing in the northern league, should players also be required to illustrate they have a certain amount of football intelligence and a fundamental grasp of the laws of the game?

I pose this question after brief sideline discourse with a (visiting) player on Saturday.

The referee had just awarded a direct free kick for the goalkeeper handing the ball outside the penalty box, and the nuggetty little No 7 went apeshit.

“It’s has to be indirect,” he screamed at the ref (who ignored him).

Standing behind the goal (not far from Blogmeister Enzo, as it happened) – I offered a quick correction: “Nah, hand ball is always a direct free kick, pal.”

To my astonishment, he turned and replied – as if he had me on toast – “You’re wrong, because he’s the goalkeeper, remember!”

This was accompanied by a sneer that is the exclusive domain of the intellectually conceited.

And worse, No 7 then trotted over to the sideline to share his supposedly superior knowledge with the lino (who ignored him).

It reminded me of a bad habit of one of the veterans of my club, who for nigh on 10 years in northern league would regularly appeal for offsides from goal kicks.

In my view stupidity and ignorance don’t just impact on football, but rate among the wider challenges we face in society in general these days (notably allowing smarmy politicians to sell utter bullshit to gullible Kiwis).

But in the pressure-cooker atmosphere on a football pitch, ignorance which can unnecessarily aggravate conflict could be easily addressed.

If there was a requirement for players – perhaps as part of regional league registration – to pass a written or verbal test on the laws of the game, which was renewable every three years, it might easily remove a contributing factor to some on-pitch histrionics.

Okay, so it is never going to be a thing. (In evidence I point to the far bigger failure of the code to even manage to invoke sensible amateur misconduct regulations in New Zealand for close on 30 years now).

But, hey, this is the blogosphere, so we can make shit up as we go.

So, (drum roll, please) In The Back Of The Net is proud to launch the “New Zealand Football Quality Player Mark (QPM)”.

And if NZF would like to promote it with the same rigour that has accompanied the Quality Club Mark nationally, the accompanying patter could go something like this (Don’t pay me NZF, this is a free consultancy) …

The New Zealand Football Quality Player Mark (QPM) accreditation programme is designed to identify, support and highlight football players in New Zealand who are knowledgeable about the sport they love to compete in, and is aligned to New Zealand Football’s  “Whole of Football Intelligence Plan”.

The sporting landscape across New Zealand is changing, and we need to ensure that our football players across the country have a sporting chance of staying relevant in the ever-evolving domestic game and avoiding looking and sounding like complete dickheads.

Thus only footballers with QPM status will be licenced to compete at regional level and play in the Chatham Cup.

The QPM is a national partnership across the seven Federations and supported by a range of sporting, community and non-governmental organisation partners who hate seeing utter dummies be such terrible ambassadors for the code out on the pitch.

QPM is good practice for your team and you individually and is recommended for all football players in New Zealand.

There are two levels of achievement in the Quality Player Mark;

1 STAR – Good practice player (knows the offside rule)

2 STAR – Great practice player (knows hand ball is a direct free kick)

But that’s just me. Welcome the thoughts of others, and perhaps even some more colourful vignettes from referees.

[Cordwainer Bull is a former Waikato United and Waikato FC programme columnist. His hobbies include fork bending and collecting in-flight sick bags. His favourite player was Roy Little.]

Categories: Other Football Topics

Tagged as:

Enzo Giordani

A grassroots football enthusiast based in Auckland, New Zealand, and a fan of the most magnificent club on earth - A.S. Roma. More info (including e-mail address) can be found here: https://in-the-back-of-the.net/about/

5 replies

  1. At a bare minimum players ought to be conversant with the below, truth be known, as a player I might have been somewhat selfish in the interpretation of law 12 but at least I was conversant with it and, furthermore I ‘volunteered’ to whistle games on many occasions over many years to the point where I became an accredited ref, only so that I could report the rubbish & abuse referees have to endure regularly to the respective FF.

    As a coach, I am increasingly frustrated with two things; players, like the afore mentioned, who continuously make a dick out of themselves, trying to convince all and sundry that their random acts of thuggery and ignorance are within ‘the laws of the game’ and referees who seemingly cave under the pressure and let these dicks get away with the shit we see weekend in weekend out across the (not just) grassroots pitches.

    Time to put a stake in the ground…. you want to play the game at a FF sanctioned level, prove that you are ‘qualified to do so’ and then be held accountable for your actions.
    https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_12_fouls_misconduct_en_47379.pdf

  2. A ‘gold’ award could given to the player who can explain the offside rule to their wife/gf and they actually understand it.

  3. A little off the theme, but my frustration at watching football now ( especially NFF Premier ) is the amount of players yelling ‘hey ref !!!!! ” every time a tackle is made, even when the tackle is fair. Seems they just yell it out every time now. If they all could play half as well as they shout and complain, they would be world class players.Very frustrating to watch. Just lucky I’m not a ref I guess !!!!

  4. TV commentators should also have to pass a LOTG test to prove they know what they are talking about. Far too often they get it wrong, even on Premier League and international matches.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: